@conference{Liao2019,

title = {Building Jiminy Cricket: An architecture for moral agreements among stakeholders},

author = {Beishui Liao and Marija Slavkovik and Leendert van der Torre},

url = {https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.04741.pdf},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-03-07},

booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society},

pages = {147–153},

abstract = {An autonomous system is constructed by a manufacturer, operates in a society subject to norms and laws, and is interacting with end-users. We address the

challenge of how the moral values and views of all stakeholders can be integrated

and reflected in the moral behaviour of the autonomous system. We propose an artificial moral agent architecture that uses techniques from normative systems and

formal argumentation to reach moral agreements among stakeholders. We show

how our architecture can be used not only for ethical practical reasoning and collaborative decision-making, but also for the explanation of such moral behavior.},

note = {Pre SFI},

keywords = {Artificial Intelligence, WP2: User Modeling Personalization and Engagement},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {conference}

}

@conference{Dyrkolbotn2018,

title = {On the distinction between implicit and explicit ethical agency},

author = {Sjur Dyrkolbotn and Truls Pedersen and Marija Slavkovik},

url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3278721.3278769},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3278721.3278769},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-12-01},

booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES '18)},

pages = {74–80},

abstract = {With recent advances in artificial intelligence and the rapidly increasing importance of autonomous intelligent systems in society, it is becoming clear that artificial agents will have to be designed to comply with complex ethical standards. As we work to develop moral machines, we also push the boundaries of existing legal categories. The most pressing question is what kind of ethical decision-making our machines are actually able to engage in. Both in law and in ethics, the concept of agency forms a basis for further legal and ethical categorisations, pertaining to decision-making ability. Hence, without a cross-disciplinary understanding of what we mean by ethical agency in machines, the question of responsibility and liability cannot be clearly addressed. Here we make first steps towards a comprehensive definition, by suggesting ways to distinguish between implicit and explicit forms of ethical agency.},

note = {Pre SFI},

keywords = {Agency, Artificial Intelligence, Autonomy, Epistemology, Ethics, WP2: User Modeling Personalization and Engagement},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {conference}

}