Jeng Jia-Hua
PhD Candidate
University of Bergen
2024
Jeng, Jia Hua; Kasangu, Gloria Anne Babile; Starke, Alain D.; Trattner, Christoph
Emotional Reframing of Economic News using a Large Language Model Conference
ACM UMAP 2024, 2024.
@conference{emorefram24,
title = {Emotional Reframing of Economic News using a Large Language Model},
author = {Jia Hua Jeng and Gloria Anne Babile Kasangu and Alain D. Starke and Christoph Trattner},
url = {https://mediafutures.no/umap2024___jeng_alain_gloria_christoph__workshop_-3/},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-07-01},
urldate = {2024-07-01},
booktitle = {ACM UMAP 2024},
abstract = {News media framing can shape public perception and potentially polarize views. Emotional language can exacerbate these framing effects, as a user’s emotional state can be an important contextual factor to use in news recommendation. Our research explores the relation between emotional framing techniques and the emotional states of readers, as well as readers’ perceived trust in specific news articles. Users (N = 200) had to read three economic news articles from the Washington Post. We used ChatGPT-4 to reframe news articles with specific emotional languages (Anger, Fear, Hope), compared to a neutral baseline reframed by a human journalist. Our results revealed that negative framing (Anger, Fear) elicited stronger negative emotional states among users than the neutral baseline, while Hope led to little changes overall. In contrast, perceived trust levels varied little across the different conditions. We discuss the implications of our findings and how emotional framing could affect societal polarization issues},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {conference}
}
News media framing can shape public perception and potentially polarize views. Emotional language can exacerbate these framing effects, as a user’s emotional state can be an important contextual factor to use in news recommendation. Our research explores the relation between emotional framing techniques and the emotional states of readers, as well as readers’ perceived trust in specific news articles. Users (N = 200) had to read three economic news articles from the Washington Post. We used ChatGPT-4 to reframe news articles with specific emotional languages (Anger, Fear, Hope), compared to a neutral baseline reframed by a human journalist. Our results revealed that negative framing (Anger, Fear) elicited stronger negative emotional states among users than the neutral baseline, while Hope led to little changes overall. In contrast, perceived trust levels varied little across the different conditions. We discuss the implications of our findings and how emotional framing could affect societal polarization issues
2023
Jeng, Jia Hua; Starke, Alain D.; Trattner, Christoph
Towards Attitudinal Change in News Recommender Systems: A Pilot Study on Climate Change Workshop
2023.
@workshop{Jeng2023,
title = {Towards Attitudinal Change in News Recommender Systems: A Pilot Study on Climate Change},
author = {Jia Hua Jeng and Alain D. Starke and Christoph Trattner},
url = {https://mediafutures.no/jeng2023-towards-attitudinal-change-in-news2908-2/},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-04-18},
urldate = {2023-04-18},
abstract = {Personalized recommender systems facilitate decision-making in various domains by presenting content closely aligned with users’ preferences.
However, personalization can lead to unintended consequences. In news, selective information exposure and consumption might amplify
polarization, as users are empowered to seek out information that is in line with their own attitudes and viewpoints. However, personalization in
terms of algorithmic content and persuasive technology could also help to narrow the gap between polarized user attitudes and news consumption
patterns. This paper presents a pilot study on climate change news. We examined the relation between users’ level of environmental concern, their preferences
for news articles, and news article content. We aimed to capture a news article’s viewpoint through sentiment analysis. Users (N = 180)
were asked to read and evaluate 10 news articles from the Washington Post. We found a positive correlation between users’ level of environmental
concern and whether they liked the article. In contrast, no significant correlation was found between sentiment and environmental concern.
We argue why a different type of news article analysis than sentiment is needed. Finally, we present our research agenda on how persuasive technology
might help to support more exploration of news article viewpoints in the future.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {workshop}
}
Personalized recommender systems facilitate decision-making in various domains by presenting content closely aligned with users’ preferences.
However, personalization can lead to unintended consequences. In news, selective information exposure and consumption might amplify
polarization, as users are empowered to seek out information that is in line with their own attitudes and viewpoints. However, personalization in
terms of algorithmic content and persuasive technology could also help to narrow the gap between polarized user attitudes and news consumption
patterns. This paper presents a pilot study on climate change news. We examined the relation between users’ level of environmental concern, their preferences
for news articles, and news article content. We aimed to capture a news article’s viewpoint through sentiment analysis. Users (N = 180)
were asked to read and evaluate 10 news articles from the Washington Post. We found a positive correlation between users’ level of environmental
concern and whether they liked the article. In contrast, no significant correlation was found between sentiment and environmental concern.
We argue why a different type of news article analysis than sentiment is needed. Finally, we present our research agenda on how persuasive technology
might help to support more exploration of news article viewpoints in the future.
However, personalization can lead to unintended consequences. In news, selective information exposure and consumption might amplify
polarization, as users are empowered to seek out information that is in line with their own attitudes and viewpoints. However, personalization in
terms of algorithmic content and persuasive technology could also help to narrow the gap between polarized user attitudes and news consumption
patterns. This paper presents a pilot study on climate change news. We examined the relation between users’ level of environmental concern, their preferences
for news articles, and news article content. We aimed to capture a news article’s viewpoint through sentiment analysis. Users (N = 180)
were asked to read and evaluate 10 news articles from the Washington Post. We found a positive correlation between users’ level of environmental
concern and whether they liked the article. In contrast, no significant correlation was found between sentiment and environmental concern.
We argue why a different type of news article analysis than sentiment is needed. Finally, we present our research agenda on how persuasive technology
might help to support more exploration of news article viewpoints in the future.