2021
|
| Responsible media technology and AI: challenges and research directions Journal Article Christoph Trattner; Dietmar Jannach; Enrico Motta; Irene Costera Meijer; Nicholas Diakopoulos; Mehdi Elahi; Andreas L. Opdahl; Bjørnar Tessem; Njål Borch; Morten Fjeld; Lilja Øvrelid; Koenraad De Smedt; Hallvard Moe In: AI and Ethics, 2021. @article{cristin2000622,
title = {Responsible media technology and AI: challenges and research directions},
author = {Christoph Trattner and Dietmar Jannach and Enrico Motta and Irene Costera Meijer and Nicholas Diakopoulos and Mehdi Elahi and Andreas L. Opdahl and Bjørnar Tessem and Njål Borch and Morten Fjeld and Lilja Øvrelid and Koenraad De Smedt and Hallvard Moe},
url = {https://app.cristin.no/results/show.jsf?id=2000622, Cristin
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-021-00126-4.pdf},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00126-4},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-12-20},
urldate = {2021-12-20},
journal = {AI and Ethics},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
|
2020
|
| Changing news use. Unchanged news experiences? Book Irene Costera Meijer; Tim Groot Kormelink Routledge, 2020, ISBN: 9780367485788, (Pre SFI). @book{Meijer2020c,
title = {Changing news use. Unchanged news experiences?},
author = {Irene Costera Meijer and Tim Groot Kormelink},
url = {https://www.routledge.com/Changing-News-Use-Unchanged-News-Experiences/Meijer-Kormelink/p/book/9780367485788},
isbn = {9780367485788},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-11-09},
publisher = {Routledge},
abstract = {Changing News Use pulls from empirical research to introduce and describe
how changing news user patterns and journalism practices have been
mutually disruptive, exploring what journalists and the news media can
learn from these changes.
Based on 15 years of audience research, the authors provide an in-depth
description of what people do with news and how this has diversified
over time, from reading, watching, and listening to a broader spectrum
of user practices including checking, scrolling, tagging, and avoiding.
By emphasizing people’s own experience of journalism, this book also
investigates what two prominent audience measurements – clicking and
spending time – mean from a user perspective. The book outlines ways to
overcome the dilemma of providing what people apparently want (attentiongrabbing
news features) and delivering what people apparently need (what
journalists see as important information), suggesting alternative ways to
investigate and become sensitive to the practices, preferences, and pleasures
of audiences and discussing what these research findings might mean for
everyday journalism practice.
The book is a valuable and timely resource for academics and researchers
interested in the fields of journalism studies, sociology, digital media, and
communication.},
note = {Pre SFI},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
Changing News Use pulls from empirical research to introduce and describe
how changing news user patterns and journalism practices have been
mutually disruptive, exploring what journalists and the news media can
learn from these changes.
Based on 15 years of audience research, the authors provide an in-depth
description of what people do with news and how this has diversified
over time, from reading, watching, and listening to a broader spectrum
of user practices including checking, scrolling, tagging, and avoiding.
By emphasizing people’s own experience of journalism, this book also
investigates what two prominent audience measurements – clicking and
spending time – mean from a user perspective. The book outlines ways to
overcome the dilemma of providing what people apparently want (attentiongrabbing
news features) and delivering what people apparently need (what
journalists see as important information), suggesting alternative ways to
investigate and become sensitive to the practices, preferences, and pleasures
of audiences and discussing what these research findings might mean for
everyday journalism practice.
The book is a valuable and timely resource for academics and researchers
interested in the fields of journalism studies, sociology, digital media, and
communication. |
| Changing News Use. Unchanged news experiences? Book Irene Costera Meijer; Tim Groot Kormelink 1st, Routledge, London & New York, 2020, ISBN: 9781003041719, (Pre SFI). @book{Meijer2020,
title = {Changing News Use. Unchanged news experiences?},
author = {Irene Costera Meijer and Tim Groot Kormelink },
url = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345018999_Changing_News_Use_Unchanged_News_Experiences},
doi = {10.4324/9781003041719},
isbn = {9781003041719},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-09-01},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {London & New York},
edition = {1st},
note = {Pre SFI},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
|
2019
|
| Journalism, Audiences and News Experience Book Chapter Irene Costera Meijer In: Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin; Hanitzsch, Thomas (Ed.): Chapter 25, pp. 389-405, Routledge, 2nd, 2019, ISBN: 9781315167497, (Pre SFI). @inbook{Meijer2019,
title = {Journalism, Audiences and News Experience},
author = {Irene Costera Meijer },
editor = {Karin Wahl-Jorgensen and Thomas Hanitzsch },
url = {https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/journalism-audiences-news-experience-irene-costera-meijer/e/10.4324/9781315167497-25},
doi = {10.4324/9781315167497-25},
isbn = {9781315167497},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-06-01},
pages = {389-405},
publisher = {Routledge},
edition = {2nd},
chapter = {25},
abstract = {This chapter focuses on the main analytical concepts used to study audiences in journalism and how they can be refined and extended by amplifying the field of journalism studies with insights and theories from neighboring disciplines. The use of audience engagement figures has led to concerns about the influence of Google, YouTube, and Facebook on news access and news availability. In terms of history, attention to changing user practices of news and journalism should be added to the discipline’s more common focus on narrating the history of particular news organizations or journalists. News reach, which is measured through newspaper circulation, ratings, and market shares, was primarily the concern of marketing departments. News users can be expected to act ethically by reflecting on the kind of friendship that journalism triggers in them, by the amount of time they choose to spend with these friends, and by taking on the responsibility for their own news participation.},
note = {Pre SFI},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
This chapter focuses on the main analytical concepts used to study audiences in journalism and how they can be refined and extended by amplifying the field of journalism studies with insights and theories from neighboring disciplines. The use of audience engagement figures has led to concerns about the influence of Google, YouTube, and Facebook on news access and news availability. In terms of history, attention to changing user practices of news and journalism should be added to the discipline’s more common focus on narrating the history of particular news organizations or journalists. News reach, which is measured through newspaper circulation, ratings, and market shares, was primarily the concern of marketing departments. News users can be expected to act ethically by reflecting on the kind of friendship that journalism triggers in them, by the amount of time they choose to spend with these friends, and by taking on the responsibility for their own news participation. |
2016
|
| “Practicing Audience-Centred Journalism Research.” Book Chapter Irene Costera Meijer In: Witschge, T.; Anderson, C. W.; Domingo, D.; Hermida, A. (Ed.): Chapter 36, pp. 546-561, Sage, 55 City Road, London, 2016, ISBN: 9781473906532, (Pre SFI). @inbook{Meijer2016,
title = {“Practicing Audience-Centred Journalism Research.” },
author = {Irene Costera Meijer},
editor = {T. Witschge and C.W. Anderson and D. Domingo and A. Hermida},
url = {https://sk.sagepub.com/Reference/the-sage-handbook-of-digital-journalism/i3760.xml},
doi = {10.4135/9781473957909.n36},
isbn = {9781473906532},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
pages = {546-561},
publisher = {Sage},
address = {55 City Road, London},
chapter = {36},
abstract = {The production and consumption of news in the digital era is blurring the boundaries between professionals, citizens and activists. Actors producing information are multiplying, but still media companies hold central position. Journalism research faces important challenges to capture, examine, and understand the current news environment. The SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism starts from the pressing need for a thorough and bold debate to redefine the assumptions of research in the changing field of journalism. The 38 chapters, written by a team of global experts, are organised into four key areas: Section A: Changing Contexts Section B: News Practices in the Digital Era Section C: Conceptualizations of Journalism Section D: Research Strategies By addressing both institutional and non-institutional news production and providing ample attention to the question 'who is a journalist?' and the changing practices of news audiences in the digital era, this Handbook shapes the field and defines the roadmap for the research challenges that scholars will face in the coming decades.},
note = {Pre SFI},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
The production and consumption of news in the digital era is blurring the boundaries between professionals, citizens and activists. Actors producing information are multiplying, but still media companies hold central position. Journalism research faces important challenges to capture, examine, and understand the current news environment. The SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism starts from the pressing need for a thorough and bold debate to redefine the assumptions of research in the changing field of journalism. The 38 chapters, written by a team of global experts, are organised into four key areas: Section A: Changing Contexts Section B: News Practices in the Digital Era Section C: Conceptualizations of Journalism Section D: Research Strategies By addressing both institutional and non-institutional news production and providing ample attention to the question 'who is a journalist?' and the changing practices of news audiences in the digital era, this Handbook shapes the field and defines the roadmap for the research challenges that scholars will face in the coming decades. |
2014
|
| Checking, sharing, clicking and linking: Changing patterns of news use between 2004 and 2014. Journal Article Irene Costera Meijer; Tim Groot Kormelink In: Digital Journalism, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 664-679, 2014, ISSN: 2167-0811, (Pre SFI). @article{Meijer2014,
title = {Checking, sharing, clicking and linking: Changing patterns of news use between 2004 and 2014.},
author = {Irene Costera Meijer and Tim Groot Kormelink},
url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21670811.2014.937149?needAccess=true},
doi = {10.1080/21670811.2014.937149},
issn = { 2167-0811},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-08-01},
journal = {Digital Journalism},
volume = {3},
number = {5},
pages = {664-679},
abstract = {This paper challenges the generally taken-for-granted automatic link between media platforms, media technology and news user practices. It explores what has changed in people’s news consumption by comparing patterns in news use between 2004–2005 and 2011–2014. While new, social and mobile media technologies did not unleash a revolution in people’s dealings with news, they have facilitated, deepened and broadened user practices we already found in 2004–2005: monitoring, checking, snacking, scanning, watching, viewing, reading, listening, searching and clicking. In addition, these forms of news usage appear to increasingly order, control, organize and anchor other practices and the experience of time and environment in which they occur. Meanwhile, new and mobile news practices like linking, sharing, liking, recommending, commenting and voting have not become as central to news consumption as often assumed.},
note = {Pre SFI},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This paper challenges the generally taken-for-granted automatic link between media platforms, media technology and news user practices. It explores what has changed in people’s news consumption by comparing patterns in news use between 2004–2005 and 2011–2014. While new, social and mobile media technologies did not unleash a revolution in people’s dealings with news, they have facilitated, deepened and broadened user practices we already found in 2004–2005: monitoring, checking, snacking, scanning, watching, viewing, reading, listening, searching and clicking. In addition, these forms of news usage appear to increasingly order, control, organize and anchor other practices and the experience of time and environment in which they occur. Meanwhile, new and mobile news practices like linking, sharing, liking, recommending, commenting and voting have not become as central to news consumption as often assumed. |
